SCOTUS Cases From United States Reports
> Luther v Borden 1849
> Texas v White 1868
>> With Notes
> Minor v Happersett 1874
>> With Notes
> Civil Rights Cases 1883
>> With Notes
Good source for research of native documents: HathiTrust.org
Resources
>>CA Code 1027.5
>>Vattel's Law of Nations
>>Bouvier's Law Dictionary (1856)
>>Texas v White (1869)
>>White v Hart (1871)
>>United States v. Cruikshank (1875)
>>Minor v Happersett (1875)
>>Black's Law Dictionary (1891)
>>En Legis Definition
>>>State-Citizen.org by Roger McDonald
>>>Organic Laws of the United States of America
>>>USA vs US by TJ Henderson
>>>Alfred Adask's Website
>>>Peter Hendrickson's Cracking the Code at LostHorizons.com
>>>Corey Eib's Blog
Search
Recent Rails
- New Show, New Home: Agenda31 on the No Agenda Stream
- Agenda31 Broadcast - March 8, 2014 | New Format, Freedom Index, Road Side Traffic Stop Like No Other & More...
- Common Sense Revisited - March 1, 2014 | Hunting Communists, Cognitive History, 3.5% People Factor
- Common Sense Revisited - Feb 22, 2014 | FCC, CDC, FBI, Schrader for Sheriff, Narcisse for Governor, CA Superior Court & More...
- Four Important SCOTUS Cases & Evidence The People of the Several States Are Guaranteed a Republican Form of Government
- Common Sense Revisited - February 8, 2014 | IRS Morale, NSA Fail, CA Judicial Council, Titles of Nobility, SCOTUS Deep Dive
- Common Sense Revisited - February 1, 2014 |
- Common Sense Revisited - January 25, 2014 |
- CA Code 1027.5 - Worldwide Movement For Totalitarian Dictatorship
- Common Sense Revisited - January 11, 2014 | Jurisdictional Warfare and General Appearances in Court
Twitter Feeds
Subscribe Buttons
How to Make Your Own Common Law ID
Make An Appearance w/o Enter a Plea
Navigation
User login
Jun
19
Notice of Lis Pendens; International Maritime Execution
Sat, 06/19/2010 - 11:57
This document is well worth downloading and reviewing from: http://www.restoreamericaplan.net/newsbreak
Notice of Lis Pendens; International Maritime Execution
My questions regarding these documents:
a) the trustees...are these folks claiming status or standing within the defacto corp? I ask because of them NOT stating united States with lower case united...they are consistent
b) its a damn compelling read...if they want it to go viral it needs to be text or html ready so we will have to retype it to ppublish as a web page....assuming all will download and read an attachment is folly
c) is this an attempt to adjudicate or leverage within the defacto system? I ask due to the citation of the UN on the first FAX cover page to the International Court of Justice....